Knowledge Item: CA-Quality of Life and Health-50
 Trends in Quality of Life Over the Course of the Treatment Episode Part XIII–Length of Time a Participant is Maintained at the Same or an Improved Quality of Life as a Function of Treatment in Different Types of Programs

This Knowledge Item is a direct follow-up to Knowledge Item: CA-Quality of Life and Health-43.

The probability of maintaining an individual at or above the baseline Total Quality of Life Score was estimated from a Cox (proportional hazards) regression or survival analysis. This Knowledge Item contrasts the relative ability of three kinds of services–managed medical care; comprehensive medical care including "wrap-around" social services; community-based psychosocial service providers–to maintain patients at 100%, 90%, and 80% of their baseline total quality of life. The Comprehensive Medical Care and Psychosocial Service providers had indistinguishable curves that maintained patient-rated quality of life for the longest periods of time. The Managed Medical Care programs were not as successful at maintaining quality of life. These results statistically control for the initial baseline level of quality of life, differences due to psychosocial and behavioral comorbidities, and  other patient characteristics. 

More than half of the individuals, in this progressive disease, may be maintained at the same or higher quality of life for a period of time approaching the maximum in our evaluation study, of about three years. Patients in the Comprehensive Medical Care and Psychosocial Service (with linked medical) Programs are the most likely to be maintained. 

Further analyses given in Knowledge Items: CA-Quality of Life and Health-37, -42, -43, -51, and -39, as well as Knowledge Items: CA-Medical Outcomes-11, -12, and -13 show additional analyses that confirm that the projects with wrap-around comprehensive psychosocial services, supplementing basic medical services, tend to maintain the patient at the same or an increased quality of life for a longer time, and with a greater ratio of improvement, than just medical services. The additional Knowledge Items use alternate statistical designs and models with different factors "controlled," but the different methods of assessing the relative effectiveness of these different types of service models in achieving improved quality of life for the patients all point out the importance of integrated psychosocial or "wrap-around" services.

Days Quality of Life is Maintained at Three Types of Projects

More Information:     Survival Function or Survival Curve


Mean Days Quality of Life is Maintained at or Above Baseline Level

More Information:     CHAID and CHAID Diagram


Mean Ratio of Highest Quality of Life Score to Baseline Over the Course of Treatment (Ratio > 100 is Improvement) Over the Course of Treatment

More Information:     CHAID and CHAID Diagram

Note: The sample size for this Knowledge Item is 38 patients smaller than that of Knowledge Item CA-Quality of Life and Health-43 to which this is a follow-up. We did not use the data from one Managed Care medical site in this analysis specifically because the goal of the project was to treat people at the end of their lives when quality of life is low. All other projects, including those whose data are used here, are primarily providers of outpatient medical care, rather than home health care.

In interpreting this Knowledge Item, and all others in this section on Quality of Life and Health, remember that the ratings of quality of life, symptom impact, and healthcare utilization are based on patient self reports.

Knowledge Item Citation: Huba, G. J., Melchior, L. A., Panter, A. T., and the HRSA/HAB SPNS Cooperative Agreement Steering Committee (1998-2001). Knowledge Item: CA-Quality of Life and Health-50 from HRSA/HAB's SPNS Cooperative Agreements on Innovative Models of Care, The Measurement Group Knowledge Base on HIV/AIDS Care, Online at www.TheMeasurementGroup.com.

Last Updated: March 25, 2005; data through June 15, 1999; analyses conducted February - June 2000.




Knowledge Base Citation: The Knowledge Base and this Knowledge Item were designed and authored by G. J. Huba, Ph.D.; in collaboration with Lisa A. Melchior, Ph.D.; A. T. Panter, Ph.D.; and the staff of The Measurement Group. Cite this work as "Huba, G. J., Melchior, L. A., and Panter, A. T. (1998 - 2001). The Measurement Group Knowledge Base on HIV/AIDS Care. On the World Wide Web: http://www.TheMeasurementGroup.com."

Questions or Comments: Contact The Measurement Group.

Use of Knowledge Base Information: Acceptable Uses and Limitations.

Collaborators from Participating Projects: Cooperative Agreement Steering Committee 1999

Participating Projects: This Knowledge Base is based on the service delivery experiences of 27 Cooperative Agreement Projects on Innovative Models of HIV/AIDS Care. These projects and the Evaluation and Dissemination Center which produced this Knowledge Base were funded by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), HIV/AIDS Bureau (HAB) as Special Projects of National Significance (SPNS) between 1994 and 1999. Click the Model Programs button above for descriptions of the projects that contributed to this specific Knowledge Item, a list of key staff, and project grant numbers.

Why This Evaluation was Conducted: Editorial.

More Information: Design of this Knowledge Base.

Recommended Citation Format for Web Materials: American Psychological Association Publication Manual Section, Revised 2001.

Work on the Knowledge Base and the cross-cutting evaluation was supported in part by Grant Number 5 U90 HA 00030-05 from the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), HIV/AIDS Bureau's (HAB) Special Projects of National Significance (SPNS). The contents of this Knowledge Base are solely the responsibility of The Measurement Group and do not necessarily represent the official views of HRSA or HRSA/HAB's Special Projects of National Significance nor may they represent the positions of the individual grantees whose projects are included in the cross-cutting evaluation.



© Copyright 2005 by The Measurement Group LLC. All rights reserved.